<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/4643">
<title>Presentations</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/4643</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/4681"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/4644"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T15:06:44Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/4681">
<title>Impact factor, predatory &amp; plagiarism</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/4681</link>
<description>Impact factor, predatory &amp; plagiarism
Lugya, Fredrick Kiwuwa
These two working documents provide a comprehensive overview of key concepts in scholarly communication, focusing on journal evaluation and publication ethics. The first document defines journal impact factors as citation-based metrics that indicate a journal’s prestige, and introduces popular tools such as CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), and the h-index. It also addresses the threat of predatory journals, offering resources like COPE and the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) to verify legitimacy. Additionally, it outlines common causes of unintentional plagiarism, including inconsistent citations and poor referencing. The second document expands on calculating and comparing impact factors using databases like Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. It provides a detailed comparison of their coverage, strengths, and weaknesses. Together, these documents serve as a practical guide for researchers to identify reputable journals, understand citation metrics, and maintain academic integrity through proper attribution.
Together, these two pieces of working documents provide researchers with practical guidance on evaluating journal quality, avoiding predatory publishers, and understanding citation analysis for scholarly communication. The first document is a presentation that introduces journal impact metrics (JIF, SJR, SNIP), defines predatory journals, and outlines plagiarism causes. The second is a detailed workshop guide explaining how to find and interpret impact factors using databases like Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. It includes a comprehensive comparison table of these tools' coverage, strengths, and weaknesses.
</description>
<dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/4644">
<title>Embedding national knowledge infrastructure for STI-Led innovation : positioning Uganda’s libraries, archives &amp; information institutions in the amended UNCST act.</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/4644</link>
<description>Embedding national knowledge infrastructure for STI-Led innovation : positioning Uganda’s libraries, archives &amp; information institutions in the amended UNCST act.
Lugya, Fredrick Kiwuwa
The paper advocates for amending the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST) Act to formally position libraries, archives, and information institutions as core national knowledge infrastructure. It identifies a critical gap: despite UNCST's mandate to disseminate research, Uganda's outputs are often inaccessible—published behind international paywalls or lost in fragmented, unpublished formats—which stifles innovation and leads to duplicated efforts. The author proposes four key amendments: legally recognizing information institutions as essential STI infrastructure, mandating open-access deposition of publicly funded research in Ugandan repositories, including librarians in STI governance committees, and establishing a unified National STI Digital Knowledge Gateway. These changes aim to transform UNCST from a ceremonial clearinghouse into a functional system that preserves, organizes, and provides access to Ugandan knowledge, thereby fueling local innovation, ensuring research transparency, and maximizing the return on public investment in science and technology.
This presentation by Dr. Fredrick Kiwuwa Lugya argues for the strategic amendment of Uganda's UNCST Act to integrate libraries, archives, and digital repositories into the national science, technology, and innovation (STI) ecosystem. It highlights the systemic failure of Uganda to retain and utilize its own research, evidenced by case studies where critical findings are locked behind international paywalls or lost in personal archives, thereby crippling local innovation and leading to wasteful duplication. The core proposal is to legally redefine STI infrastructure to include knowledge institutions, mandate open-access deposition for publicly funded research, include librarians in STI governance bodies, and empower UNCST to create a National Digital Knowledge Gateway. These reforms aim to operationalize UNCST's mandate by building a centralized, accessible, and preserved national knowledge base, transforming research from a scattered, invisible asset into a functional "operating system" for Uganda's intelligence and innovation-driven future.
</description>
<dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
