Investigation of system design criteria and the capital cost of varying design return periods for soil and water conservation structures highlights.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Otim, Daniel
dc.contributor.author Smithers, Jeffrey C.
dc.contributor.author Senzanje, Aidan
dc.contributor.author van Antwerpen, Rianto
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-21T00:53:12Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-21T00:53:12Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.citation Otim, D., Smithers, J. C., Senzanje, A., & van Antwerpen, R. (2020). Investigation of System Design Criteria and the Capital Cost of Varying Design Return Periods for Soil and Water Conservation Structures. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 36(4), 511-523. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0883-8542
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.60682/x9x6-sc14
dc.description Journal article en_US
dc.description.abstract Design of conservation structures includes both hydrologic and hydraulic designs. Hydrologic design involves the estimation of design floods which are required for the sizing of the hydraulic structures. The minimum recommended return period for the design of conservation structures is 10 years but due to the projected levels of risk, and the fact that a few large events are likely to be responsible for the majority of the erosion, the 10-year return period currently recommended may be inadequate. This study investigated system design criteria and the capital cost of varying design return periods for soil and water conservation structures in the sugar industry of South Africa. Observed rainfall data and results of runoff, peak discharge, and sediment yield simulated using the Agricultural Catchments Research Unit (ACRU) model were utilized in this study. Relationships between extreme events of sediment yield and the rainfall, runoff, and peak discharge events associated with them were analyzed and the capital cost of varying design return periods was also investigated. The results showed that only 0.2% of sediment yield events contributed up to 95% of the annual sediment yield simulated in the sugar production areas in South Africa and that any event of rainfall, runoff, and peak discharge had the potential to generate an extreme sediment yield event provided the soil surface was not adequately protected. Based on a sustainable soil loss of 5 t ha-1, the 20-year return period was recommended for the design of soil and water conservation structures. Furthermore, the capital cost implication of varying design return periods from the minimum 10-year return period ranged from an increase of 16% to 35% across the sugar industry. Therefore, given that soil erosion is associated with adverse effects on sustainable crop production and also increases in costs of replanting destroyed crops, the 20-year return period is recommended for the design of soil and water conservation structures in the sugar industry in South Africa. Keywords. Capital cost, Design criteria, Erosion, Return period, Risk, Soil, and water conservation. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers en_US
dc.subject Capital cost en_US
dc.subject Design criteria en_US
dc.subject Erosion en_US
dc.subject Return period en_US
dc.subject Risk en_US
dc.subject Soil and water conservation en_US
dc.title Investigation of system design criteria and the capital cost of varying design return periods for soil and water conservation structures highlights. en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search BUOADIR


Browse

My Account